
March 25, 2026 | 12:00 - 1:00 PM ET
Who Gets to Decide? Public Voice and the Future of AI
AI development is moving fast — but who's shaping it? Not most of the people who will live with the consequences.
Faisal Lalani, Head of Global Partnerships at the Collective Intelligence Project, works on one of the harder problems in AI governance: how to channel public input into places where decisions get made. That means coordinating across civil society, domain experts, and governments worldwide — and wrestling with what democratic participation in AI looks like at scale.
In this Pop-Up, Faisal will share findings from CIP's 2025 Global Dialogues Index Report — which surfaced perspectives from more than 6,000 people across 70 countries — and introduce weval.org, CIP's platform for running societal impact evaluations on frontier models. He'll dig into what gets lost when lived experience is stripped out of how we evaluate AI, and why standard approaches to public engagement so often fall short.
The question underneath all of it: Can AI governance be democratic, and what would it take?
Speakers
Faisal Lalani is a global community organizer born in Hyderabad, India, and living in New York City. He spent the past decade living and working in over a dozen countries to understand how emerging technologies were affecting the world's most vulnerable populations. Whether it's studying progressive curricula in rural Nepal or building community wireless networks in South African townships, he has worked to reconcile people and power to shape an inclusive and expansive future.
Faisal is now the Head of Global Partnerships at the Collective Intelligence Project, where he actively coordinates with AI labs, governments, and civil society. He is also the Executive Director of We Are One Humanity, a global human rights foundation founded by Rajmohan Gandhi.
Agenda
Welcome and introductions by Project Liberty.
Why was the Council on Tech and Social Cohesion founded? What did it set out to achieve?
An overview of the consultative process behind developing the Blueprint and the Three Pillars that shape it, along with a comparison of pro-social and anti-social design principles illustrating how intentional design choices can promote or hinder social good.
Open discussion with participants, facilitated by Project Liberty.
Focused conversations in three breakout rooms, one for each of the report's three pillars: 1) Advancing prosocial design standards, 2) Enabling independent platform research, 3) Shifting market forces to reward ethical innovation.
Open discussion with participants, facilitated by Project Liberty.
Final reflections and next steps
Community Commitments
Project Liberty events are built on mutual respect, curiosity, and shared purpose. To help create an environment where everyone can participate fully, we invite you to read our Events Community Commitments in advance. They are shared principles—developed with input from our broader network—that guide how we listen, engage, and work together across differences.
Thanks for helping us create a welcoming and purposeful gathering. For any questions, please contact events@projectliberty.io.
